Ways to Increase Your AcademicVisibility
The aim of scholarly research is to make a contribution to the existing human knowledge. Still, many scholars are aware of valuable articles that are rarely cited in the academic literature. The innovative advances delayed by the cumulative research impact lost cannot be accurately calculated at this moment. Probably eighty years from now, future studies willpresent detailed insights into the causes and consequences of early 21 th centur y’s increased scholarship fragmentation.
A large number of your peers (most of them outside your specific area of research) have a million and one reasons to do something other than spend long hours searching for articles from different fields and trying to find out which of them might offer (against the odds) some novel perspective or unexpected justification for their own research.
A Five–Step Solution to Increase Your Academic Visibility
1. Craft your articles for a larger audience.
There is no secret that papers grounded in and speaking to multiple fields often have the broadest impact and appeal. If most of your articles do not fall in this category, spend some time trying to identify a different academic audience that currently debates issues to which you could providean unexpected perspective (concentrate on publishing in international journals across disciplines). Remember that “We are not students of some subject matter but students of problems. And problems may cut right across the borders of any subject or discipline”. (Karl Popper)
As dissemination of scientific publications via the web is becoming more common nowadays, serendipity isintricately woven within the fabric of a casual Google search. Make sure you write “search-engine friendly” papers (read here and here some useful tips).
Present your finding in ways that are credible and persuasive to the readers. Without engaging your expected audience into the text, a flawless logic of complex arguments might have in some cases alienating effects as many potential readers do not attempt to decipher those academic articles looking like an impenetrable thicket of words. In case you have been socialized into the norms of writing through a process of implicit learning, you might appreciate some articulated suggestions on academic discourse from peers like Sternberg (here), Boellstorff (here and here), Ellis (here), Bem (here and here ), Caulley (here), Weick (here), Frank (here), Fernández–Ríos & Buela–Casal (here)
2. Submit your articles to suitable journals.
Don’t aim only at those journals that are rejecting over 80% of the manuscripts submitted for consideration as this narrowapproach might imply in the end a lot of frustration for you, a delay in publication andan inefficient use of reviewers’ time and energy.
3. Self–archive your papers.
A brief synthesis relevant to theOA/non–OA debate, can be found in an article published not long ago in Journal of Clinical Psychology:
“Harnad and Brody (2004) compared the citation counts of individual OA and non–OA physics articles appearing in thesame (non-OA) journals (The OA articles in non–OA journals were made OA by their authors through self–archived eprints).They found citation advantages for OA articles of 200 to 300%, depending on the publication year. Similar studies have compared OA andnon–OA articles in astronomy, computer science, electrical engineering, mathematics, philosophy, and political science, findingOA impact advantage rates of 25 to 250% (Antelman, 2004; Eysenbach, 2006; Hajjem, Harnad, & Gingras, 2005b; Kurtz et al., 2005a; Lawrence, 2001), with an average OA advantage of 93.2%in psychology (Hajjem et al., 2005a).[…] Scholars wishing to maximize the diffusion of their research among the professional community should deposit eprints of their work in OA archives. There are no copyright or other legal barriers to this OA strategy, with 91% of research journals (including all APA and Wiley journals) already giving theirexplicit green light to authors self–archiving of pre– or postprints (Eprints, 2008). One hundred percent OA is a reachable goal.”
4. Be committed to disseminate the findings of your work.
A “C ERN for social s cie nti sts ” is unlikely to be created in the next decades. In this context, you should become more involved in the dissemination of your papers. As stated by Shelley E. Taylor in her article, “marketing papers, a concept alien to some scientists, is increasingly important if we are to reachthe multiple fields to which our work may contribute. […]We can send our papers out to a target audience that might otherwise not read the journal. Authors might be well advised to create a list of people in other fields unlikely to otherwise encounter the paper and e–mail it to them.”
5. Network curiously and habitually with other scholars.
You might consider creating an account on asite like Academia.edu. Your profile should not be limited to your name and the email address. Upload a photo, your papers, select at least some relevant research interests, “follow” the profiles of your peers, etc. Give others a chance to find out more about your work! Uncuriosity can be dangerously comfortable especially within the sophisticated, intellectual world of Academe. In the effort to raise your long–term visibility and impact, you must become aware of novel research opportunities. Also, remain curious about big, intractable problems and invest at least one hour/week for online interaction with scholars from outside your niche research area. Keep in mind that theoretical innovation and new findings come often through cross–fertilization and interdisciplinary research.
Note: You can help scholarly research circulate and interact more freely by forwarding the above educational hypertext to your peers or by posting it on any academic blog or listserv, under the Creative Commons – Attribution–NonCommercial–ShareAlike 3.0 . The author does not assume and hereby disclaims any liability to any party for any loss or damage resulting from the inappropriate useof information mentioned in Ways to Increase Your Academic Visibility (the webpages and their contents areprovided on an “as is“ basis, withoutwarranty of any kind, either express or implied from the author). Sept. 2010